Status and plans as of June 2016
Dear Malariacontrol.net contributor,
It's been a while since we announced that malariacontrol.net will be back after a short period of maintenance and upgrading, and you are probably wondering why you are still not receiving new workunits.
By now, it looks like malariacontrol.net will not be sending out workunits any time soon. The reason for this is that, unlike when we started out more than ten years ago, volunteer computing is currently not the most efficient and cost-effective approach for providing the computing resources necessary for the simulation studies. Developments in high-performance computing and institutional arrangements have made computing infrastructure accessible to the malaria modeling project which was simply not available ten years ago. Also, the staffing profile of the project has changed over time, and maintenance and further development of the volunteer computing platform are more challenging these days than before. Therefore, at the moment we cannot justify the significant investment required to upgrade the malariacontrol.net-specific components of the BOINC server for the next phase of the project.
This is a good moment to look back on more than 10 years of running malariacontol.net, and the achievements you contributed to. We believe that the project has substantially improved knowledge of malaria and malaria control. The scientific articles which are listed on the BOINC wiki give an overview of the achievements. In addition, some of the simulation experiments we ran on malariacontrol.net have formed the basis of technical reports and software tools which helped inform important policy decisions.
We will keep the malariacontrol.net server running for now. It may be that sometime in the future, we will have applications that will make this again the best way for running simulations, so please keep your BOINC client connected to malariacontrol.net.
Thank you very much for your generous support over the last 10 years!
On behalf of the malaria modeling team,
-- 21 Jun 2016 14:34:35 UTC · Comment
Why there are no work units at the moment
Dear malariacontrol.net community,
Apologies for not responding sooner to the lack of work-units for malariacontrol.net. We had some technical problems with our attempts to fit improved models of malaria dynamics to field data. This meant that we had to close down the generation of new work units.
We hoped that this would be a very short term problem, but over Christmas and the New Year, it was difficult to assess exactly what was going on. Unfortunately we are now faced with the challenge that for a variety of personal reasons the team members able to address these problems are currently not available, and we don’t have any spare funding that we can allocate to hiring anyone new.
We are now almost at the 10th anniversary of malariacontrol.net and we are really hoping to keep this going, but it will probably be another month or two before we can get the system up again.
Malariacontrol.net has now been going for ten years, and your contributions to this over the years have been really useful- (take a look at
Instead of this apology, we would really like to be sending you all a big thank you! 28 Jan 2016 9:12:12 UTC · Comment
A thank you and some science updates
Dear malariacontrol.net supporters,
It has been some time since we sent you a science post, not because we haven't been busy, quite the contrary.
But before sharing exciting science, we'd like to express our deep gratitude for your continued support and computational time.
We had a busy few years working on important topics in malaria research and global health: from vector control strategies in pre-elimination countries, to optimization of malaria control tools in support of the Global Fund applications, to key analyses for policy decisions on malaria vaccines. Just to name a few.
Here are some recent articles we would like to share with you:
You may have read recently in the news that the world may be close to the first malaria vaccine being approved for use in sub-Saharan Africa. The European Medicines Agency (EMA) adopted a positive scientific opinion for the malaria vaccine RTS,S, also known as Mosquirix, in children aged 6 weeks to 17 months. This is a key step in the regulatory process towards making RTS,S available for the population at risk of malaria in sub-Saharan Africa. The next step involves WHO reviewing the evidence base for RTS,S and making a policy recommendation for if and how this vaccine should be used alongside other tools to prevent malaria in different endemic settings. The policy recommendation is meant to provide technical guidance to endemic countries considering the vaccine introduction. The WHO has indicated that such a policy recommendation may be possible still in 2015.
The modelling team and your work contributed to assessment of the vaccine in terms of its expected public health impact and cost- effectiveness, providing information in addition to the clinical trial data.
Some of this work was recently published
"The public health impact of malaria vaccine RTS,S in malaria endemic Africa: country-specific predictions using 18 month follow-up Phase III data and simulation models"
by Melissa Penny and our team at Swiss TPH
You can access the article here:
Thanks for your help!
We also recently published on another important issue: reasons for potential shift of burden to older ages with partially effective malarial interventions. Simulations from OpenMalaria were used to address this, so we thank you for your support.
"Age-shifting in malaria incidence as a result of induced immunological deficit: a simulation study"
by Peter Pemberton-Ross in our modelling team at Swiss TPH
You can access the article here:
Cost Effectiveness of Malaria Control Interventions
Tools that allow for in silico optimization of available malaria control strategies can assist decision-making process for prioritizing interventions.
One such example :
"Modeling the Cost Effectiveness of Malaria Control Interventions in the Highlands of Western Kenya"
by Erin Stuckey previously with our modelling team at Swiss TPH
you can access the article here:
Again thank you for your continued support and volunteering computer time!
Melissa Penny and the malaria modelling team at Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute. 22 Sep 2015 13:51:06 UTC · Comment
OpenMalaria v33 on beta
We have just updated the Beta application on malariacontrol.net to version 33 of our simulation software, OpenMalaria. At the same time we have started some new jobs to take advantage of the features in this version of the software.
Since several users reported problems with the 64-bit Windows version of the app added in the last Beta update, this has been disabled and we have reverted to using the 32-bit version on 64-bit Windows.
- Malariacontrol.net team 17 Dec 2014 11:20:35 UTC · Comment
OpenMalaria looking for a new systems administrator/software engineer
The team that developed the OpenMalaria software that runs on MalariaControl.net is looking for a new systems administrator/software engineer to work in Basel, Switzerland. For details see:
https://recruitingapp-2698.umantis.com/Vacancies/321/Description/2 3 Sep 2014 10:25:09 UTC · Comment
Updating test application
As of today, I am updating the malaria control test application to OpenMalaria v32 (see previous news item). Also today, I will be starting a small experiment using this simulator version of roughly 17000 workunits.
With this release comes support for an extra platform: 64-bit Windows (previously, the 32-bit Windows application was used on both 32-bit and 64-bit Windows). This build requires the .NET framework and has so far only been tested on Windows 7 and 8.1, so let us know if you run into any issues.
- D Hardy 18 Jul 2014 9:02:47 UTC · Comment
I am scheduling a small amount of down-time next Monday for server updates. If all goes to plan this will only be a few minutes.
In other news, release 32 of our simulator software, OpenMalaria, is ready for use. This release includes a lot of work to increase the breadth of types of malaria intervention and intervention deployment strategies which OpenMalaria can simulate, as well as allowing monitoring of multiple subsets of the simulated human population. The test application and shortly thereafter branch A will be updated to use this in the next few weeks.
Diggory Hardy 30 Jun 2014 14:41:03 UTC · Comment
Down, and back
Dear BOINC users,
As you may have noticed, malariacontrol.net has been down since Friday the 24th. By the time you see this message, it should be up and fully operational again, but it might still need some adjustment.
Our apologies go to everyone inconvenienced: the cause of the down time was beyond our control, but we should perhaps have been better prepared to handle it. In any case, malariacontrol.net should be up and running again now, though there are a few things which may still need sorting out. Delays were mostly to give us more time to test the new server set-up and due to some non-technical reasons (lets just say life includes some joyous moments you can't miss).
The cause of the failure was simple enough: hardware failure of an old machine. We have set up the a server to take over the running of malariacontrol.net (on significantly more powerful hardware), using backups of the old machine. Unfortunately the terminal failure of the old machine means that we were forced to use backups from a few hours before the failure, and any results uploaded just before the failure have been lost. For us, this means some work will have to be resubmitted; for you, it means you may have lost some credit (hopefully we can compensate for this).
The short of it is we're back up now with more server capacity than before and keen to make up for lost time. Thanks to you for sticking around, lets get going again — and please do let us know if there are any problems due to the migration!
Nicolas Maire 4 Feb 2014 10:49:32 UTC · Comment
Science update part III: till June 2013
Dear malariacontrol.net user,
In our third installment on the science update, we look at how your cpu cycles helped Olivier Briët and his colleagues explore the pressing issue of how insecticide resistance might affect the cost effectiveness of an intervention, as reported in Effects of pyrethroid resistance on the cost effectiveness of a mass distribution of long-lasting insecticidal nets: a modelling study.
The effectiveness of insecticide-treated nets in preventing malaria is threatened by developing resistance against pyrethroids. Little is known about how strongly pyrethroid resistance affects the effectiveness of vector control programmes.
In this analysis, data from experimental hut studies on the effects of long-lasting, insecticidal nets (LLINs) on nine anopheline mosquito populations, with varying levels of mortality in World Health Organization susceptibility tests, were used to parameterize models. Both simple static models predicting population-level insecticidal effectiveness and protection against blood feeding, and complex dynamic epidemiological models, where LLINs decayed over time, were used. The epidemiological models, implemented in OpenMalaria, were employed to study the impact of a single mass distribution of LLINs on malaria, both in terms of episodes prevented during the effective lifetime of the batch of LLINs, and in terms of net health benefits expressed in disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) averted during that period, depending on net type (standard pyrethroid-only LLIN or pyrethroid-piperonyl butoxide combination LLIN), resistance status, coverage and pre-intervention transmission level.
The basis model features are displayed in a graphic of the useful lifetime of a single ITN distribution. As the nets age, the insecticide in the net wears out and the number of holes in the nets increases. These factors combine to limit the useful lifetime a single net distribution. Note that the slight bump in the baseline malaria level after the net distribution is no longer in effect is real: the cases averted and decreased exposure during the viable net distribution decreases immunity. With no other intervention, the episodes per person over time returns to the baseline level.
With the most resistant mosquito population, the LLIN mass distribution averted up to about 40% fewer episodes and DALYs during the effective lifetime of the batch than with fully susceptible populations. However, cost effectiveness of LLINs was more sensitive to the pre-intervention transmission level and coverage than to mosquito susceptibility status. For four out of the six Anopheles gambiae sensu lato populations where direct comparisons between standard LLINs and combination LLINs were possible, combination nets were more cost effective, despite being more expensive. With one resistant population, both net types were equally effective, and with one of the two susceptible populations, standard LLINs were more cost effective.
Despite being less effective when compared to areas with susceptible mosquito populations, standard and combination LLINs are likely to still be cost effective against malaria even in areas with strong pyrethroid resistance.
So, well done you! for contributing to this work. 30 Jul 2013 14:20:10 UTC · Comment
Science update part II: till March 2013
Dear malariacontrol.net member,
As promised, here is the second of our three part update on the science of malariacontrol.net. We look at some cost effectiveness analyses that were only possible with your donated cpu cycles.
Mass drug administration (MDA), where the entire population is treated with antimalarial drugs, and mass screening and treatment (MSAT), which involves screening the whole population of interest and only treating those who test positive, are two strategies that may have the potential to reduce P. falciparum malaria burden. Although it is more complex to organize, one would prefer to use MSAT in order to avoid over-use of drugs and contributing to the spread of drug resistance. But is MSAT likely to be a good use of resources, and if so, where? Can we put a number on it?
Decision makers need comparable information on both the effects and cost of interventions. With your help, simulations have been run to try to quantify the incremental cost per unit health gain from well-designed MSAT campaigns in different health systems and transmission settings.
For this analysis the outcome measure was the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), expressed as dollars per malaria case averted. Cases averted by MSAT were obtained using simulation results from malariacontrol.net and costs estimated from an economic model using literature on the costs of similar interventions in sub-Saharan Africa. The calculated ICER results were compared to the ICERs of increasing case management or insecticide-treated net (ITN) coverage in each setting. Here by case management we mean doctor’s visits, hospitalization when needed and follow up care.
As you can see in the graphic, the incremental savings of each method depended very much the baseline transmission level [ recall last week’s post on EIR]. This figure suggests that MSAT was most cost-effective in settings with a moderate disease burden.
The results of your simulations showed that at low transmission MSAT was never more cost-effective than scaling up ITNs or case management and is probably not worth considering. Instead, MSAT may be more suitable at medium to high transmission levels and at moderate ITN coverage. In these settings, the cost-effectiveness of MSAT may be comparable to that of scaling up case management and ITN coverage. In all the transmission settings considered, achieving a minimal level of ITN coverage is a best buy. An interesting finding, and one that merits further investigation, is that achieving 80% ITN coverage across all settings, as per current global malaria strategies, may not be an efficient use of resources, particularly in low-transmission settings.
This study suggests that policy-makers may want to consider MSAT to reduce the malaria burden as they choose among interventions for their populations. It also shows how the malaria models can be used to simulate combinations of interventions and generate estimates of their relative cost-effectiveness. We intend to build on this type of work in the future.
If you would like more detail on this work, see the paper by Valerie Crowell and others Modelling the cost-effectiveness of mass screening and treatment for reducing Plasmodium falciparum malaria burden.
Again, thanks for all your volunteered CPU cycles – we couldn’t do it without you. 30 Jul 2013 13:27:11 UTC · Comment
Science update part I: till January 2013
26 Jul 2013 9:41:40 UTC
It has been a busy year at malariacontrol.net. Much too busy to tell you about the good work you’ve contributed to in just one post. Therefore, this science update comes in three parts, to be published over the next few days.
This first post we will talk about some work that was published last fall, looking at how best to estimate the best way to eliminate malaria in low transmission settings.
Malaria transmission is governed by many things, but when scientists are talking about transmission, they are generally thinking of the entomological inoculation rate [EIR], that is, the average number of infected mosquito bites a person receives in a year. In some of the worst malarial areas, this number can easily be in the hundreds of bites per year.
EIR is generally measured by trapping mosquitos and seeing what percentage of them are infected with malaria and then factoring in the number of bites they give a night. For example, a catch of 20 biting Anopheles per person per night, where 16 are human-fed and 2 of those are infected with malaria sporozoites would correspond to an EIR for that day of 20 x 16/20 x (2/16) 1 = 1.68. Each individual in that area receives an average of 1.68 infective bites per night or an annual EIR 613 - an indication of very high malaria transmission. But when the transmission rate is very low (which is, in and of itself, a good thing), perhaps an EIR of 1 or 2 per year, you would need to trap many more mosquitos to get a reliable estimate of the percentage of them carrying malaria. Further, one should not assume that the overall dynamics of transmission would be the same in these low transmission areas compared to the higher, better studied ones.
Erin Stuckey at the Swiss TPH used malariacontrol.net to explore transmission dynamics in a low-transmission setting, the Rachuonyo South highlands above the shores of Lake Victoria in Kenya. One of the reasons we run models is to try to understand which factors have the most impact on outcome of interest (in this case, malaria control). She found that key issues for Rachuonyo were vector biting behaviour, their susceptibility to indoor residual spraying (IRS), and the detection method used for human surveys – all of these affect the impact of interventions in areas with low and/or unstable P. falciparum transmission.
Erin also looked at the influence detection method used for surveys on the final estimate of prevalence. To address model sensitivity to the ability of a given test to detect a P. falciparum infection, an experiment was created to mimic the detection limits of a rapid diagnostic test (RDT), polymerase chain reaction (PCR), skilled microscopy, and a low-quality diagnostic such as a poor-quality RDT or unskilled microscopy. The prevalence estimate decreases with higher detection limits, as does the stochasticity of the predictions.
This graphic from Erin's paper shows this effect of changing the detection limit (number of parasites per microliter) at which the survey is able to detect P. falciparum infection on the simulated number of P. falciparum infections in a population of 10,000 individuals for
a) baseline model with a detection limit of 200, equivalent to RDT;
b) detection limit of 40, equivalent to PCR;
c) detection limit of 100, equivalent to skilled microscopy; and
d) detection limit of 500, equivalent to a poor quality diagnostic.
The implication is that if RDTs used in surveys perform poorly, whether the result of low quality manufacturing or improper storage conditions or use, according to simulation results up to half of infected individuals would be misclassified.
Decision makers need some kind of guidance on where to best put their efforts at malaria control. We need simulations such as these especially when the field data are sparse. In this case, measuring EIR through mosquito collection may not be the optimal way to define transmission in areas with low, unstable transmission, but simulation results from models such as OpenMalaria can help fill the gap between what we can realistically measure in the field and what we need to know about a given area for malaria control.
26 Jul 2013 9:41:40 UTC
Science update August 2012
Read about recent adventures in model-fitting, and how your simulation runs were used to analyse which factors were most important to determine the effective lifetime of long-lasting insecticide treated nets. more... 29 Aug 2012 7:59:23 UTC · Comment
Status update Mar-Jul 2012
Read about some of our scientific progress in the first half of 2012. Read more.
28 Aug 2012 13:30:34 UTC · Comment
Branch B update to 6.63
We're planning to update Branch B to application version 6.58. We switched of the generation off workunits for this branch (6.57 and 6.58 are not compatible) until we got all workunits back.
But 'Branch A' and 'openMalaria test version' are still generating new workunits :) 28 Aug 2012 7:42:32 UTC · Comment
Situation on malariacontrol.net back to normal
The situation on malariacontrol.net is back to normal. Malariacontrol is generating and sending workunits at a normal rate.
Guillaume 20 Dec 2010 8:40:14 UTC · Comment
The workunits' amount to be validated has decreased... malariacontrol is now generating new workunits (at a slow rate)
To allow the malariacontrol validator to catch up a bit (about 55'000 results are still waiting for validation), malariacontrol will not send new jobs in the next hours.
Edit: After few hours not generating workunits, malariacontrol is now generating new workunits, but at a slow rate.
Guillaume 6 Dec 2010 8:22:38 UTC · Comment
High server load
Our server is currently overloaded. As a result few work units will be available and validation of completed work units will be slow (credit is granted upon successful validation). 1 Dec 2010 16:24:57 UTC · Comment
Update on credit corrections
The project is running again, total credits are fixed, but validation is currently disabled. 26 Nov 2010 15:37:14 UTC · Comment
Server will be shutdown for maintenance
The server will be shutdown today for maintenance.
Thanks for your understanding.
Guillaume 26 Nov 2010 10:12:07 UTC · Comment
Termporarily disabled stats dumps
We stopped exporting credit statistics to third party sites temporarily. We will reactivate it once credit granting is back to normal. 25 Nov 2010 15:41:43 UTC · Comment
Status update - November
We have recently analysed a lot of the results of simulation experiments we ran over the last few months. Some of the results are currently being written up for publication, others were already presented to the malaria research community at scientific meetings. Here are the links to summaries of presentations given recently at the Parasites to Prevention: Advances in the understanding of malaria conference, and the Annual meeting of the American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene.
Modeling the effects of vector control interventions in reducing malaria transmission, morbidity and mortality
Predicted impact of mosquito-stage transmission-blocking vaccines using an ensemble of microsimulations
Using ensemble modeling to predict the cost-effectiveness of pre-erythrocytic malaria vaccines
Modeling the effects of vector control interventions in reducing malaria transmission and disease
Thank you for your ongoing support.
16 Nov 2010 9:45:50 UTC · Comment
The project has been updated, the server is now working
11 Aug 2010 0:00:00 UTC
The project will be available ony intermittently on Wed Aug 11 from 11.00am CET due to system maintenance.
10 Aug 2010 0:00:00 UTC
There was serious problem during the server upgrade yesterday, and we finally managed to recover the server. We apologize for the inconvenience.
4 Aug 2010 0:00:00 UTC
The project will be offline for approx. two hours Tue Aug 2 from 10.00am CET for maintenance.
2 Aug 2010 0:00:00 UTC
We are submitting new workunits on malariacontrol.net. Please read this for more information.
6 Jul 2010 0:00:00 UTC
We have submitted some work-units for a follow-up experiment.
4 Mar 2010 0:00:00 UTC
malariacontrol.net will stop sending out new workunits for a few weeks starting Mon March 1st. Please read this and this for more information.
27 Feb 2010 0:00:00 UTC
Status update and outlook
26 Feb 2010 0:00:00 UTC
The project will be offline for approx. two hours tomorrow Tue Feb 9 from 10.00am CET for maintenance.
8 Feb 2010 0:00:00 UTC
The "Dutch Power Cows" team used the "Serious request" fund-raiser currently happening in Holland to promote malariacontrol.net. Read more here.
22 Dec 2009 0:00:00 UTC
An article in Wall Street Journal on the use of volunteer computing in medical research features malariacontrol.net
27 Oct 2009 0:00:00 UTC
October status update: D Hardy
1 Oct 2009 0:00:00 UTC
August status update: A Ross
27 Aug 2009 0:00:00 UTC
The project will be offline for approx. one hour Fri Aug 21 from 10.30am CET for maintenance.
20 Aug 2009 0:00:00 UTC
The project will be offline for approx. one hour later today for maintenance.
15 May 2009 0:00:00 UTC
Project out of work intermittently. Please read this thread for more information.
4 Dec 2008 0:00:00 UTC
The database problem is fixed. However, we expect that workunits will be available only intermittently for the next few hours.
3 Nov 2008 0:00:00 UTC
We're currently experiencing problems with our database. We're working on a solution. Sorry for the inconvenience.
3 Nov 2008 0:00:00 UTC
The optimizer application will leave testing status during next week, from monday 15.Sept. 08 More info
12 Sep 2008 0:00:00 UTC
The project server may be intermittently unavailable later today while we're testing a new backup process.
25 Jul 2008 0:00:00 UTC
We will stop sending out work for the optimizer application from tomorrow, 2008-07-03, and resume in ca. 2 weeks time.
2 Jul 2008 0:00:00 UTC
The project will be stopped again for approx. one hour for maintenance tomorrow 2008-06-05, starting 08:00 UTC.
4 Jun 2008 0:00:00 UTC
The project will be offline for approx. one hour later today for maintenance.
2 Jun 2008 0:00:00 UTC
The optimizer application will re-enter testing status for a few days, after some major changes to the application code. More info
9 May 2008 0:00:00 UTC
Work for the malariacontrol app is available again. Here's a short summary of what happened.
19 Feb 2008 0:00:00 UTC
The malariacontrol app is currently out of work due to a problem with the database server. We are working on a solution.
19 Feb 2008 0:00:00 UTC
We're back online. More info.
27 Dec 2007 0:00:00 UTC
The project will be offline on Dec 27 and 28 2007. Please read more about this here.
19 Dec 2007 0:00:00 UTC
The project will be offline for an estimated one to two hours today, starting 13:00 UTC.
22 Nov 2007 0:00:00 UTC
On Wednesday 2007-11-21 workunits of a third science application will be sent out to the volunteers. Read more about it
19 Nov 2007 0:00:00 UTC
We have now opened account creation again. Welcome new users! Please read our Rules and Policies before you attach to the project.
22 Oct 2007 0:00:00 UTC
Please read the update on the planned optimizer application. More.
14 Sep 2007 0:00:00 UTC
We're about to start a new batch of workunits for the mappredictor application. More
14 Sep 2007 0:00:00 UTC
The project will be offline for an estimated one to two hours today, starting 08:30 UTC.
3 Sep 2007 0:00:00 UTC
The server was unreachable for the last hour due to a network failure that affected all services at University of Geneva.
2 Aug 2007 0:00:00 UTC
The project will be offline for an estimated one to two hours today, starting 16:00 UTC.
25 Jul 2007 0:00:00 UTC
The server will be down for a few hours later today for maintenance.
14 Jun 2007 0:00:00 UTC
Due to a hardware problem the server was not working properly during the last 36 hours. We're working on this.
11 Jun 2007 0:00:00 UTC
Users with Windows hosts please read this post about the mappredictor application.
31 May 2007 0:00:00 UTC
We have just updated to the latest BOINC server version.
22 May 2007 0:00:00 UTC
The project will be offline for an estimated one to two hours tomorrow, May 4th, starting 10:30 CET.
3 May 2007 0:00:00 UTC
The project will be down for maintenance for 1 to two hours today starting 14:00 CET.
17 Apr 2007 0:00:00 UTC
AIMS workshop on Volunteer Computing: 16-22 July, 2007 More info
23 Mar 2007 0:00:00 UTC
We will update some of the server components later today. As a consequence the project may be down for one or two hours. Please let us know if you find problems.
22 Mar 2007 0:00:00 UTC
The project will be down for maintenance for about 1 hour today starting 14:00 CET.
7 Mar 2007 0:00:00 UTC
We have partially recovered from a database problem that occured during the backup today. We are working to bring the project back up.
12 Feb 2007 0:00:00 UTC
malariacontrol.net announces the second science application. More info
9 Feb 2007 0:00:00 UTC
The server will be down for some time over the next few hours due to required system maintenance.
12 Jan 2007 0:00:00 UTC
We have now opened account creation again. Please read our Rules and Policies before you attach to the project.
4 Jan 2007 0:00:00 UTC
As announced we plan to open account creation again tomorrow January 4th, 2007, 09:30 CET, and are looking forward to welcoming new users!
3 Jan 2007 0:00:00 UTC
Please restart your BOINC client if you keep getting the following message: Scheduler request failed: HTTP file not found. Thank you!
21 Dec 2006 0:00:00 UTC
Welcome to the new server!
19 Dec 2006 0:00:00 UTC
We will now migrate to the new server, please expect the project to be down for a few hours starting today, 19.12.06, 14.00 CET. More info
19 Dec 2006 0:00:00 UTC
News is available as an RSS feed